| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
Naquatech Syndicate
1880
   |
Posted - 2016.03.03 14:58:16 -
[1] - Quote
Is the goal to make NPC stations to be second category in longer term ?
The goal should be for people to put those in stationles systems assuming those systems will have to offer anything in term of localization or resources.
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
Naquatech Syndicate
1880
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 15:07:23 -
[2] - Quote
Mia Markaya wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:MuraSaki Siki wrote:just to clarify the market tax
after the changes, when trading in citadels, transaction tax goes to system, and broker's fee goes to the owner. Is that right? Correct. The broker's fee in Citadels isn't fixed. The owner can set 0% if he wants. What's stopping the owner to switch it from 0% to 100% at a whim?
CCP Ytterbium whats the max tax owner will be able to set up ?
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
Naquatech Syndicate
1880
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 15:54:26 -
[3] - Quote
Sim Cognito wrote:NPC taxes are an essential ISK sink and an immersion factor. We have too many ISK faucets. The changes are extremely positive.
Adjusting Contract fees and Jump Clone fees is also long overdue and I welcome it.
Finally, compression and reprocessing shouldn't be instant, but that's just me I guess.
Balance ISK faucets   
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
Naquatech Syndicate
1881
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 16:50:58 -
[4] - Quote
Memphis Baas wrote:For everyone complaining of higher NPC taxes (here and in the reddit thread): CCP needs to have more ISK sinks, which they are achieving through the higher taxes and through the ISK loss rather than mineral loss for refining.
For CCP: if you really want to introduce a strong ISK sink, you have to introduce something that the people with trillions of ISK want to buy. We really wanted to buy the skill injectors; you saw how much plex trade that caused. Find something that's as desirable. Maybe some new skins, I don't know.
They could remove insurence
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
Naquatech Syndicate
1881
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 17:11:15 -
[5] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Memphis Baas wrote:For everyone complaining of higher NPC taxes (here and in the reddit thread): CCP needs to have more ISK sinks, which they are achieving through the higher taxes and through the ISK loss rather than mineral loss for refining.
For CCP: if you really want to introduce a strong ISK sink, you have to introduce something that the people with trillions of ISK want to buy. We really wanted to buy the skill injectors; you saw how much plex trade that caused. Find something that's as desirable. Maybe some new skins, I don't know. They could remove insurence or incursions.
Or rebalance mission to give more LP and less ISK
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
Naquatech Syndicate
1881
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 17:12:47 -
[6] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Memphis Baas wrote:For everyone complaining of higher NPC taxes (here and in the reddit thread): CCP needs to have more ISK sinks, which they are achieving through the higher taxes and through the ISK loss rather than mineral loss for refining.
For CCP: if you really want to introduce a strong ISK sink, you have to introduce something that the people with trillions of ISK want to buy. We really wanted to buy the skill injectors; you saw how much plex trade that caused. Find something that's as desirable. Maybe some new skins, I don't know.
EDIT: Also, everyone predicting that people will ignore citadel markets and stay in Jita, that's true, until they remove Jita. I believe the end goal is to have NO NPC stations at all. So the whole "recovering your assets is free" thing is eventually not going to be quite true. It should be interesting to see; no game has ever modeled an economic collapse before, and EVE's economy is quite an advanced simulator, pretty much the perfect testing platform. If people ignore citadels markets then that will be evidence that the npc trading taxes have been set too low...
Does this means you want to punish people living in/from NPC stations
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
Naquatech Syndicate
1882
|
Posted - 2016.03.04 10:47:51 -
[7] - Quote
If forcing people with a stick is the only method then we have a problem.
Riging the game in favor Citadels it's like you want to force them to systems that alredy have NPC stations(even 10 and more).
Should it be the goal to put them and increase activity in stationles systems, like border systems, ice systems or other standard systems. Is the only way to achive it is to "nerf NPC stations".
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
Naquatech Syndicate
1885
|
Posted - 2016.03.10 22:13:58 -
[8] - Quote
Citadels will be competitive in systems that have no stations.
Aside from mediums for corp use... why would you put one in systems with more that one station.
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
| |
|